Skip to content
Casino without a Croatian licence
Sections

Nine numbers, two issuers, one older format

What an entry in a foreign register can actually be read for

9 of the 10 operators in our table state a licence number, and that number can be looked up in the register of the body that issued it.

Ten operators with no Croatian approval. The columns are copied out of the register of the body that issued the licence and out of the operator’s own terms. A blank cell means we did not read it — never zero, and never "no limit".
CasinoLicenceCompanyThreshold for checksOpen
VaveCuraçao Gaming AuthorityLatcas B.V.at discretionOpen
Vave pays for the single link that leaves this site, and that is the whole of our commercial relationship with it. Its sportsbook and its casino sit on one account, so the same money covers both without a second stake — uncommon among operators that advertise themselves as crypto casinos. We read the licence number ourselves on 2 September 2026 in the Curaçao Gaming Authority register: OGL/2024/1676/0905, held by Latcas B.V., issued 19 May 2025, status active.
RocketpotCuracaoDanneskjold Ventures B.V.US$2,500Read
Bitcasino.ioCuraçao Gaming AuthorityMoon Technologies B.V.2,500 EURRead
Wild FortuneAnjouan Gaming BoardMetlait SRLat discretionRead
DuckDiceAnjouan Gaming BoardZentari Limitadaat discretionRead
Empire.ioAnjouan Gaming BoardPixel Entertainment Limited2,000 USDTRead
MetaspinsCuraçao Gaming Authority3-102-959384 SRLat discretionRead
RainbetAnjouan Gaming BoardRBGAMING N.V.at discretionRead
ShuffleCuraçao Gaming AuthorityNatural Nine B.V.at discretionRead
Wild.ioCuraçao Gaming AuthorityStack Gaming Ltd.at discretionRead

Three number formats in one table

A licence number is stated by 9 of the 10 operators, and those numbers come in 3 formats that differ at a glance.

The Anjouan Gaming Board issues marks shaped like ALSI-202509073-FI2. There are four of those in our table, and they are checked in the public register on that body’s pages.

The Curaçao Gaming Authority issues marks shaped like OGL/2024/210/0198. There are four of those too, and beside each we recorded a direct link to the certificate in the cert.cga.cw register.

The older Curaçao format appears once, at the operator Rocketpot, marked 1668/JAZ. The format is visibly different from the previous one, and the company name is Danneskjold Ventures B.V.

At the tenth operator there is no number. Its row therefore says the fact is not published.

The distribution is clear: five marks come out of the Curaçao system in two different formats, four from Anjouan, and one row stays blank. Two issuers, then, cover all nine records we managed to read.

Front page of the operator Rocketpot
The longest coin list in our table, thirteen, sitting in the same contract as the lowest published payout ceiling: 5,000 USD a month under clause 11.5. The threshold for identity papers is 2,500 USD under clause 11.4. The licence carries the mark 1668/JAZ from Curaçao and the company behind the brand is Danneskjold Ventures B.V. The brand states 2018 as its launch year.

What an entry in the register confirms

The check is worth making, but the extent of what it does must be described accurately.

An entry confirms that the number exists and that a name matches it. The register names the company alongside, so it is visible that the brand Bitcasino.io is run by Moon Technologies B.V. A brand name and a company name are rarely the same thing, and a dispute is with the company; all nine names from the table sit on the page about the company behind the brand.

An entry with the Curaçao Gaming Authority also carries a status. At four operators in our table it reads Active, and at the four Anjouan ones the register states that the licence is valid.

We record the date of reading beside every such fact, because status is a variable. Our check was made on 26 August 2026, and at one operator, the brand Empire.io, we reached the terms page through an archived version, which is noted on the page about reading documents.

Status is not recorded for all nine

Alongside the number a register usually carries a status mark, but here that mark does not stand beside every row.

At the four Curaçao Gaming Authority licences the record reads Active. At the four Anjouan ones the register states the licence is valid. At the ninth, the one in the older Curaçao format marked 1668/JAZ, we did not read a status, so we do not state one here in either direction.

A blank in that row means the reach of our check. It settles the question neither way: the licence may be valid or lapsed, and we simply do not know.

A status mark holds only for the day of reading in any case. Our check was made on 26 August 2026, and a register changes independently of when anyone last opened it; we record that date beside every claim, as reading documents describes.

Front page of the operator Wild.io
A weekly payout ceiling of 100,000 USD under clause 9.6 and twelve coins at the cashier. Licence OGL/2024/210/0198 was issued by the Curaçao Gaming Authority and reads Active in the register; the company behind the brand is Stack Gaming Ltd. The brand states 2022 as its launch year.

What an entry does not confirm

Here is why a number on its own settles less than people expect.

It stays silent on Croatian law. A Croatian approval for an online casino goes only to a company that already holds the right to a casino on premises, under article 35, paragraph 2, so a foreign number does not enter that arithmetic at all. The mechanism is described on the page about who holds an approval.

How quickly money leaves, and under what rule papers are asked for, stays outside it. Those answers are held by the operator’s terms, and there they differ from house to house: we separated the thresholds on the page about identity checks, the ceilings on the page about payout limits, and the width of the cashier on the page about coins.

And whether an address is under a blocking order stays outside it too. That is a separate and public fact, described on the page about the list of blocked addresses.

Why there is no Croatian record of them anywhere

A reader who looks for a Croatian register after the foreign one comes away empty-handed, and the reason lies in the statute rather than in any authority’s negligence.

The right to organise casino games is acquired, under article 3, paragraph 4 of the Gaming Act, by commercial companies with their seat in the Republic of Croatia. A company registered in Curaçao or on Anjouan does not enter that record, so Croatian files contain no row about it.

The only Croatian document in which a foreign address can appear at all is the list of those for which a blocking order has been issued, and that arises under tax law and speaks about an order, not about a licence; where it sits is described on the page about the list of blocked addresses.

Which right the Act assigns to whom, and under what condition, is set out on the page about Hrvatska Lutrija.

How to check a number yourself

The procedure is short and free.

  1. Find the number in the footer of the operator’s site or in its terms. It usually sits beside the company name.
  2. Open the register matching the format of the number: cert.cga.cw for marks beginning with OGL, the Anjouan Gaming Board’s public register for marks beginning with ALSI.
  3. Compare the company name from the register with the name in the terms. A mismatch between those two names is worth more than the existence of the number.
  4. Write down the date you did it, because a status in a register is not a permanent value.

Do not infer a year from the format of a number. We have not read the issuers’ regulations, so we do not know what each group of digits stands for; what can nevertheless be checked about the age of a brand sits on the page about a new online casino in Croatia.

Why there are no verdicts on the issuers here

We have not read the regulations of Curaçao or Anjouan, so there are no claims here about the protection those systems offer or how a complaint is pursued before them. That would be an assessment, not a fact we read.

We hold no account with any operator in the table either, so there is no sentence about how some dispute ended. We have not written to any issuer and have not sought confirmation of any record beyond what its register shows publicly. What we can show are numbers, company names and clauses of terms, with the date they were read; the rest stays open, as set out in reading documents.