Terms read from an archived copy
The only brand whose terms we did not read live
Clause 5.4 sets the threshold for supplying documents at 2,000 USDT, the lowest of the 3 published thresholds in the table. The document itself was not read from the live page but from an archived copy, and that changes its weight.
How this fact was obtained
The terms of the other nine brands were opened on their own sites. These were not.
The clause on documents was read from an archive of the document, so its value is different too: a copy proves what stood there at some moment, not what stands there today. An operator changes its terms without notice and without any duty to flag the change.
That is why this note sits beside the fact, instead of it being quietly treated as equal to the others. The rule that binds us on this is described on the page about reading documents.
A threshold of 2,000 USDT
Clause 5.4 requires documents above 2,000 USDT. Of the three published thresholds in the table this is the lowest amount, and the only one written in a crypto unit pegged to the dollar.
The other two thresholds stand in dollars and in euros. Three different currencies mean that even three published thresholds cannot be lined up without an exchange rate, and the rate moves, so the gap between them moves with it. All three figures with their clause numbers sit on the page about identity checks.
No payout ceiling was recorded
The terms we opened state no upper payout limit, so that place in the table stays a blank field.
A blank field means “we did not read it”. It stops short of “no limit”.
At this brand that caveat counts twice over, because the source itself was not a live document. The four houses that do publish a ceiling sit on the page about payout limits.
Licence and company
The licence carries the mark ALSI-132405042-FI3, was issued by the Anjouan Gaming Board, and the register records it as valid. The holder is Pixel Entertainment Limited.
The register entry is the only fact about this brand that does not depend on its own site, because it is kept by the body that issued the licence. What such an entry shows, and what it does not, is set out on the page about foreign licences.
What is not known here
The coin list is not published in the place we opened. Neither is a launch year, a game count or a supplier count.
A sportsbook sits beside the casino. Offer terms were not read.
The restricted-territory list was read and Croatia is absent from it, subject to the same caveat about the age of the source.
The Croatian frame
This brand holds no Croatian approval, as the other nine do not, and the Act opens no route to one. The seat requirement in the Republic of Croatia and the requirement of a prior right to a casino on premises are set out on the page about who holds an approval.
A player is not thereby committing an offence, because Croatian law punishes whoever organises a game or advertises it.