Terms read 26 August 2026
Thirteen coins and 5,000 USD a month in one contract
Rocketpot takes 13 coins, more than any of the 10 houses in the table, and sets its upper payout limit at 5,000 USD a month, the lowest of all those that published one at all.
Two figures pulling against each other
The cashier and the payout speak differently at this brand. There are thirteen coins, the longest list in the table; the payout ceiling is 5,000 USD a month under clause 11.5, the smallest of the four published amounts.
Anyone depositing in a less common coin gets a choice they will not find elsewhere. Anyone planning to take out a larger win in one piece meets, on the same site, the strictest published clause.
Both figures sit in the same document and both carry a clause number.
A licence in the older format
The licence mark reads 1668/JAZ and was issued in Curaçao. That number format belongs to the system preceding the current one, in which licences are recorded as OGL with a year, so two marks from the same jurisdiction cannot be read as one and the same kind of record.
We did not read the status of that licence, so the table carries a blank field there. A blank field here does not mean the licence is invalid; it means nobody checked that fact. How a number is looked up in the register that issued it is described on the page about foreign licences.
The threshold for papers is written as a figure
Rocketpot is one of the three operators in the table that publish a threshold as an amount rather than leaving it to an assessment. Clause 11.4 sets that threshold at 2,500 USD.
A clause of that kind is worth more than a polite announcement. An amount written into a contract provides a measure against which the operator’s later conduct can be checked, while a discretionary power provides none at all. The difference is set out on the page about identity checks.
Company, brand and year
The contract is made with Danneskjold Ventures B.V., not with the name in the header of the site. The brand states 2018 as its launch year, which together with Wild.io is one of only two launch years readable in this table.
The sportsbook and the casino sit under one roof.
What stayed unread
The number of games and the number of suppliers are not published in the place we opened. Offer terms were not read. Payout speed was not recorded, because no deadline in hours or minutes stands in the clauses we read.
The restricted-territory list was read and Croatia is absent from it. What that absence means, and what it does not, is set out on the page about Croatia in the operators’ terms.
The Croatian frame around the same brand
Rocketpot holds no Croatian approval, and cannot hold one: the Act ties the right to an online casino to a seat in the Republic of Croatia and to an already acquired right to a casino on premises. Both conditions are set out on the page about who holds an approval.
Croatian law does not punish taking part in a game; it punishes organising and advertising. The wording sits on the page about what the Act says.